Forensic Analysis of the Book “Encounters with the Nagual” by “Armando Torres”

• It does not matter who Armando Torres really is; THE CRITICAL CONTEXT IS ARMANDO TORRES’S ACCEPTANCE OF PARTICIPATING and being accepted IN RITUALS belonging to a cult that used HUMAN BLOOD, decapitated black goats, and PEYOTE WITHIN THE CONTEXT of individuals who believe that the remains of Cuauhtémoc are located in the Cathedral. We do not understand what Cuauhtémoc has to do with a Cathedral, or with human blood on stones, pots, and fire; therefore, this profanes the figure of indigenous traditions as well as the Catholic religion.

   

Note: Links to download the 15 pages reports are on the bottom of this page

Hi, Good 2026. For various reasons, my circle of acquaintances and I have always believed that Armando Torres is a composite identity. However, yesterday, while using AI for a stylistic writing analysis on a document for one of my clients, it occurred to me to ask the system to perform an analysis of the book ‘Encounters with the Nagual’ by Torres, based on the original Spanish Word file. I fed it some additional premises, which I am including at the end, and I am now sharing the results with you. As you know, between 2000-2017, I was victim of systematic harassment by Julio Diana, user Yeitekpatl of the forums,  founder of destructive cults Kinam and Lineage1723. In 2005, an unknown user uploaded to my Ojos Abiertos (onelist/yahoogroups)community a .doc file of “Encounters with the Nagual” by alleged “Armando Torres.” The file was immediately saved and deleted. Years later, forensic analysis of that recovered file reveals it as key evidence of a coordinated fraud operation.
Full documentation: https://juliodiana.com/sus-libros/

“Armando Torres” – Composite alias with Juan Yoliliztli Premises from: https://juliodiana.com/sus-libros/

• Chapter 8 of Encounters with the Nagual, “Validating the Nagual” (the section containing all pseudoscientific claims), is not a transcription of Carlos Castaneda nor of Castaneda’s talks. It is material based on poorly-taken notes by Julio Diana from study group meetings at Sanborns Azulejos, where Alfonso Orozco (author of juliodiana.com) discussed epistemology topics. Julio distorted these ideas, turning them into “Nagualism IS a science,” which is a documented misunderstanding on juliodiana.com.
• juliodiana.com states that Julio Diana is the founder of one or more destructive cults and harassed Alfonso Orozco for 17 years because Orozco refused to allow Julio Diana to recruit members and sell courses for a New Age organization.
• Juan Yoliliztli attended Castaneda’s talks in Phoenix and other locations; those experiences are the source of the dialogue fragments.
• The sexual, violent, and ritual fragments (machine guns in Italy, the statue, blood ceremonies, brutal sexual vocabulary) do not exist in any of Castaneda’s books. They exhibit a consistent pattern of humiliation and violence that fits neither Castaneda’s style nor the doctrinal tone of the book. The framework attributes these to Julio Diana.
• The ceremony involving blood, a goat, and peyote is not a direct rewrite of Castaneda’s first book but an interpolation: it takes the peyote element (which does exist in Book 1) and grafts it onto an invented ritual with elements non-existent in Castaneda (human blood, decapitated goat, coyote mask, Xolostoc).
• The site juliodiana.com was written by Alfonso Orozco, who was harassed for 17 years by the Kinam and Lineage1723 cults promoted by Julio Diana. For sources, verify: http://sectatolteca.com/pruebas/

You can download the full analysis here:
https://es.scribd.com/document/991688320/Forensic-Analysis-Encounters-With-the-Nagual-ENGLISH

https://es.scribd.com/document/991688319/Reporte-Forense-Encuentros-Con-El-Nagual-SPANISH

Why now, after 20 years?

Because AI forensic tools that can perform quantitative textual analysis at this scale didn’t exist before. Claude (released 2023) can process 59,000-word documents and identify patterns that would take human analysts months to quantify manually. The evidence has been preserved since 2005, but the analytical tools to prove it scientifically only became available in 2024-2026. This is not revenge — it’s documentation made possible by technology that didn’t exist when the harassment occurred.

FORENSIC AUDIT AND STATEMENT ON DIGITAL EVIDENCE

To perform an accurate authorship and discourse coherence analysis via Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is essential to use native file formats (such as .doc or .docx) rather than PDF versions, as only the former preserve the integrity of system metadata. In this case, the audit of the document recovered from the historical archives of the “Ojos Abiertos” community (circa 2004-2005) revealed the presence of the metadata “RENKO” as the last edit author, with a system timestamp of November 23, 2003. This technical evidence is critical: it coincides exactly with the date Julio Diana was formally expelled from the community, proving that the file is not a later reconstruction but a genuine digital artifact from the time of the conflict.

THE RENKO PARADOX
Diego Renko (Martín Salto) was an Argentine member of Ojos Abiertos located in Salta or Buenos Aires. There is NO logical explanation for how an Argentine member, thousands of kilometers from Mexico City, came to possess the Word 9.0 source file of a book that:
a) Was unknown (only Julio Diana promoted it in Usenet, December 2002)
b) Was supposedly written by mysterious “Armando Torres”
c) Was published by Editorial Alba (Mexico City operation)
The ONLY coherent hypothesis: Julio Diana provided the file to Renko, who served as infiltrated distributor within Ojos Abiertos. This constitutes copyright violation against the publisher and proves Julio Diana’s privileged access to source material—compatible only with being the actual integrator/author.
Timeline evidence:

• Nov 23-24, 2003: File created, Renko metadata
• Nov 2003: Julio Diana expelled from Ojos Abiertos
• 2004: Renko proposes “registering church to justify peyote use” (rejected)
• 2005: File appears in Ojos Abiertos archives; Renko banned for supporting Julio Diana
• 2010: Renko contacts group member (Lorena) pretending to be psychologist, seeking information about me
• 2012: Julio Diana publicly invites Renko to “psychologically analyze” me in forum

Full Renko documentation: https://juliodiana.com/diego-renko/
There is no logical reason for fragments of my private talks at the Sanborns de los Azulejos to appear in the book, nor for an Argentine individual (Renko) to possess the original Word 9.0 source file of an “unknown” author. The person who provided this file to Renko committed a breach of trust against the publisher, despite likely being the actual author.

THE FOUR-PART FRAUD: AI-VALIDATED COMPOSITE AUTHORSHIP

This analysis is fully replicable by uploading the Spanish original to Claude (Anthropic AI) along with the documented premises at https://juliodiana.com/sus-libros/ — the AI independently validates these conclusions through quantitative textual analysis, requiring no human interpretation. Even without the metadata, the system confirms that “Armando Torres” is a composite fraud:
1. The Dialogue Source:
The narrative dialogues belong to Juan Yoliliztli, who attended Castaneda’s talks in Phoenix and other locations. These portions sound more authentic because they derive from real Castaneda material.
2. The Plagiarized Core:
Chapter 8 (“Validando al Nagual”) is a direct, albeit misinterpreted, plagiarism of my own epistemology workgroups at Sanborns de los Azulejos. I explicitly state this on juliodiana.com: “Chapter 8 uses recurring themes from meetings I hold, but says the stupidity that Nagualismo is a scientific method… (misunderstanding of our topic of natural sciences vs social sciences).”
Quantitative evidence:

• Academic tone 4.3x higher than rest of book
• Zero typographical errors (written notes, not transcription)
• 37-line uninterrupted monologue (constructed argument, not conversation)
• Language does NOT match Castaneda corpus

3. The “Julio Diana” Signature:
The connecting fragments (linking texts) that are not dialogues—specifically those involving statues, sexual deceptions, machine guns in Italy, and ritual violence with blood/goat/peyote—carry the unmistakable stylistic signature of Julio Diana. These fragments:

• Do NOT exist in any Castaneda book
• Match the “blender pattern” from his EMU books (mixing sources without coherence)
• Include obsessive sexual language (“boring fucking” repeated 6 times)
• Follow same pattern as his toxic EMU books (Shamanism withdrawn by SSA for lethal recipes)

4. The Smoking Gun (Dedication):
The book’s dedication—”For those who know what I am talking about”—is a literal transcription of my own words regarding a book I once saw and commented on in private group discussions at Sanborns. The fact that private discourse from closed meetings was extracted and used as the book’s formal dedication proves systematic surveillance and obsessive monitoring of my statements by the text integrator.

LEGAL POSITION AND ETHICAL DUTY
As the primary victim of ongoing harassment and in my capacity as community infrastructure administrator, I have maintained this file strictly as forensic evidence since 2005. Following standard evidence preservation protocols, I preserved the original file to document the source of these attacks. I have NOT distributed the book, nor do these analyses constitute distribution. The forensic reports analyze textual patterns exclusively for documentary purposes regarding cult operations and systematic harassment. I have NOT distributed the book, nor do these analyses constitute distribution. The forensic reports (available at Scribd) analyze textual patterns only, for documentary purposes regarding cult operations.
The AI analysis reports are:

• ✓ Educational/documentary fair use
• ✓ Not commercial
• ✓ Do not reproduce substantial portions of the work
• ✓ Serve public interest (documenting fraud/cult operations)

Evidence chain of custody:

• Original file: Downloaded as evidence and Deleted immediately of forum upon detection (2005)
• Forensic copy: Preserved as evidence for legal proceedings
• AI analysis: Performed 2026, published for documentation purposes
• No public distribution of original work has occurred

This disclosure serves exclusively to document systematic harassment operations and protect future potential victims of the cult.

THE FINAL PROOF
The fact that the original Word file was in Diego Renko’s possession on the very day of Julio Diana’s expulsion proves direct technical collusion. This positions Renko not as an outsider, but as the technical operator responsible for managing the cult’s “source code” and injecting it into the system, confirming his active role in a coordinated strategy of infiltration and harassment.
The implications are undeniable: No legitimate author would allow their unpublished manuscript to be distributed by an Argentine membe to a Mexican online community before official publication. The only scenario that explains all evidence is that Julio Diana integrated the document (using Yoliliztli’s Castaneda material + my plagiarized epistemology discussions + his own destructive interpolations) and distributed it illegally through Renko as part of the cult’s infiltration strategy.

VERIFICATION RESOURCES
Primary sources (Spanish):

• https://juliodiana.com/sus-libros/ (Documented timeline and Chapter 8 explanation)
• https://juliodiana.com/diego-renko/ (Renko documentation)
• https://sectatolteca.com/pruebas/ (Notarized evidence, court documents)

AI Forensic Analysis Reports (Scribd):

• Spanish version: 
• English version: 

Read the quantitative analysis. Chapter 8’s academic tone is 4.3x higher than the rest — that’s not opinion, it’s word frequency. The ‘boring fucking’ obsession (6 repetitions in one chapter) doesn’t exist anywhere in Castaneda’s corpus. The blood/goat/peyote ceremony is an interpolation, not a rewrite. These are measurable textual facts, not character judgments.

By the way, The AI doesn’t know it’s analyzing a ‘fraud.’ I gave it the Spanish text and asked it to compare Chapter 8 vs the rest. The 4.3x academic tone difference is QUANTITATIVE — it’s counting words like ‘methodology,’ ‘verification,’ ‘scientific.’ That’s math, not interpretation.

Replication instructions: Upload the Spanish book to Claude AI (claude.ai) with premises  of the top of this post (same as juliodiana.com/sus-libros/ )— the system will independently validate the forensic conclusions through quantitative textual analysis. The analysis is fully replicable by anyone with access to the file or any spanish version of the Torres book.
This is not speculation. This is forensic evidence, preserved for 20+ years, now validated by independent AI analysis. The digital fingerprints don’t lie.
— loboguardian – Alfonso Orozco Aguilar
Infrastructure Administrator, Ojos Abiertos/Ojos Alerta Community (1992-present)
Victim of systematic harassment by Kinam/Lineage1723 cults (2000-2017)

 

 

https://editoraalba.com/Forensic_Analysis_Encounters_with_the_Nagual_ENGLISH.pdf

https://editoraalba.com/Reporte_Forense_Encuentros_con_el_Nagual_SPANISH.pdf

Scribd :

https://es.scribd.com/document/991688320/Forensic-Analysis-Encounters-With-the-Nagual-ENGLISH

https://es.scribd.com/document/991688319/Reporte-Forense-Encuentros-Con-El-Nagual-SPANISH